Tag: Work Matters

  • Good Boss, Bad Boss is Shipping in Paperback: A Look Back

     

      Sutton_GoodBossBadBossTR[1]

    Good Boss, Bad Boss is already shipping in paperback at Amazon, today is the official publication date.  It has a new red cover (which I like, I hope it isn't too intense for you) and a new chapter, an Epilogue called "What Great Bosses Do: Lessons I've l Learned Since Writing Good Boss, Bad Boss."  Fast Company already published an excerpt from the new chapter on power poisoning and will be publishing more snippets in the coming weeks. 

    This all got me thinking about Good Boss, Bad Boss, about all the fun I had fretting over and talking with people about ideas in the book, and about lots of others ideas about bosses too, since the book was first published in September, 2010.  In doing so, I looked back on some of the most popular posts and related stories on bosses.  These include:

    1. Being a Good Boss is Pretty Damn Hard — Reflections on Publication Day

    2. Lessons from Nightmare (and Dream) Bosses — INC Interview

    3. How to Be a Good Boss — by Matt May

    4. When the Shit Hits the Fan, Women are Seen as Better Bosses than Men

    5. Drinking at Work — It's not all bad — a piece for Cnn.Com

    6. Is it Sometimes Rationally to Select Leaders Randomly?

    7. Clueless and Comical Bosses: Please Help Me With Examples

    8. A Cool Neurological Explanation for the Power of Small Wins

    9. How a Few Bad Apples Can Ruin Everything — a Wall Street Journal piece I wrote

    10. What are Good Things About Having a Lousy Boss?

    11. Pixar Lore: The Day Our Bossses Saved Our Jobs — at HBR.org

    12. David Kelley on Love and Money

    I could have added a lot more — let me know which ones you like, which ones you don't form the above list, and which ones I should have added from the past six years or so I've been writing Work Matters. Thanks so much for everything

  • Why Bosses Who are Civilized and Caring, But Incompetent, can be Really Horrible

    GoodBoss_pb3

    I haven't been blogging much the last couple weeks because, in addition to the usual madness that goes with the holiday and start of the term, I have been wrapping up a new chapter for the Good Boss, Bad Boss paperback, which will appears March 15th (but I suspect will be shipping before that, Amazon usually does).  Above is the new cover, which I quite like because it stands out and is now more distinct from The No Asshole Rule. 

    I had planned to write just a few pages for the Epilogue, but once I took the time to think about what I had learned since Good Boss, Bad Boss was published, I became rather obsessed and wrote a lot of text.  As my editor Rick Wolff wisely advised, I trimmed back the original draft quite a bit, but it still runs about 8,000 words. The opening looks back on the experience and devotes special attention to Luiz Uruza, the boss of the trapped Chilean miners (who I first wrote about at Psychology Today.)  and was interviewed about on CNN International.  I then present new nine lessons I've learned or come to believe in more strongly about what it takes to be a great boss. 

    To give you a taste, I thought you might like to see the fourth lesson (warning, this will be copy-edited, so it may read slightly different when it is published, but the point will remain the same):

    4.  Bosses who are civilized and caring, but incompetent, can be really horrible.

    Perhaps because I am the author of The No Asshole Rule, I kept running into people – journalists, employees, project managers, even a few CEOs – who picked a fight with me: They would argue that good bosses are more than caring human-beings; they make sure the job gets done.  I responded by expressing agreement and pointing out this book defines a good boss as one who drives performance and treats people humanely.   Yet, as I started digging into the experiences that drove my critics to raise this point – and thought about some lousy bosses – I realized I hadn’t placed enough emphasis on the damage done, as one put it, by “a really incompetent, but really nice, boss.” 

    As The No Asshole Rule shows, if you are a boss who is a certified jerk, you may be able to maintain your position so long as your charges keep performing at impressive levels.  I warned, however, that your enemies are lying in wait, and once you slip-up, you are likely to be pushed aside with stunning speed. 

    In contrast, one reason that baseball coach Leo Durocher’s famous saying “nice guys finish last” sometimes right is that, when a boss is adored by followers (and peers and superiors too) they often can’t bring themselves to bad-mouth, let alone fire or demote, that lovely person.  People may love that crummy boss so much they constantly excuse, or don’t even notice, clear signs of incompetence. For example, there is one senior executive I know who is utterly lacking in the necessary skills or thirst for excellence his job requires.  He communicates poorly (he rarely returns even important emails and devotes little attention to developing the network of partners his organization needs), lacks the courage to confront — let alone fire — destructive employees, and there are multiple signs his organization’s reputation is slipping. But he is such a lovely person, so caring and so empathetic, that his superiors can’t bring themselves to fire him.

    There are two lessons here.  The first is for bosses.  If you are well-liked, civilized, and caring, your charms provide protective armor when things go wrong.  Your superiors are likely to give you the benefit of the doubt as well as second and third chances – sometimes even if you are incompetent.  I would add, however, that if you are a truly crummy boss – but care as much for others as they do for you — stepping aside is the noble thing to do. The second lesson is for those who oversee lovable losers.   Doing the dirty work with such bosses is distasteful. But if rehabilitation has failed — or things are falling apart too fast to risk it — the time has come to hit the delete button.

    I'd love to hear your thoughts. Do you agree? What did I leave out?  How do you deal with one?  And, following my recent post, are the advantages to working for one of these lovable losers?

  • Work Matters Passes 1.5 Million Page Views

    I just noticed this little milestone. According to stats supplied by Typepad, Work Matters passed 1.5 million page views this week (1514242 at the moment). Typepad also shows Work Matters has averaged 946.99 page views per day.  I've done 1002 posts (wow… what a blabbermouth) and you've made 4404 comments.

    It seems like I just started blogging yesterday, but I wrote my first post on about June 10th, 2006. It just said "hi, I am blogging" basically, and I deleted it (now I am sorry). My first substantive post was called Brainstorming in the Wall Street Journal in which I commented, and challenged, research and stories suggesting that "brainstorming doesn't work." My next post was called Masters of the Obvious, which argued that the best managers don't do magical, mysterious, or massively complex things well — they use widely known, well-understood, and simple methods, and implement them relentessly and well.  This theme perists in Good Boss, Bad Boss and in this HBR post.

    Looking ahead, I am thinking about finding an alternative to Typepad as I find it most user-unfriendly.  The editor is awful and does strange and unexpected things to my text that I can't figureo ut how to repair.  If you have any suggestions, please let me know.  Also, will keep blogging away, but anticipate that my range of topics will get broader as I am starting a couple new projects.  I also expect that I will blog a bit less in the coming year or so because I will start writing one, possibly two, new books. I also expect, knowing me, that at some point I will stop blogging.  I can't predict when, but I give myself standing permission to stop doing things when they are no fun any longer!

    As I am in a reflective mood about this blog, it would be great to hear some feedback from readers. What do you want more of? What do you want less of?  Any ideas about how to improve things?

    Finally, I want to thank all of you for reading my blog over the years, for your comments and emails, and for all the wisdom you've provided over the years.

     

     

  • Work Matters: The Best of 2009

    I tried to resist the temptation to do one of these "best of" lists, but I succumbed as I started looking back at posts from the year. As I looked back at this year versus last, I realized that the focus on workplace assholes that was so strong when I started this blog in 2006 has faded quite a bit, and I tend to focus more broadly on workplace and management issues. Sure, I still talk about assholes (I have accepted that, no matter what else I ever have done or will do, I will always be "the asshole guy").  Yet, no doubt because it is the theme of my next book, I now talk more about bosses — what it takes to be a good one, the difference between good ones and bad ones, and a host of related topics. 

    I picked my favorite from each month. I usually picked a post that generated a lot of comments. I always appreciate the comments that people make, and I thought that they were better than ever this year — so I thought it would also be fun to pick my favorite comment on each post.  I know this runs long; sorry,  I am professor who is prone to profess too much!

    January: Eleanor Roosevelt vs. Randy Komisar on Failure.  This post was inspired by two opposing quotes, which are contradictory, but — I believe — both true.  'The first is from former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt: "Learn from the mistakes of others. You can’t live long enough to make them all yourself." This has to be true. But serial entrepreneur, serial author, and venture capitalist Randy Komisar also made a compelling case when he argued "yes, you can learn from others, but  "the only way to really, really get your money's worth, is to do it yourself" because "nothing else creates that hollow feeling in your stomach."  

    This post generated 10 thoughtful comments.  My favorite was from John, who wisely pointed out "I also know a few airplane pilots. They are definitely in Eleanor Roosevelt's camp. It may depend on how onerous the penalties for failure are." 

    February: CEO Compensation Research : Why You Want Rich People to Set Your Pay.   I picked this one because CEO compensation has been such a hot topic.  This post summarizes a study by Charles O'Reilly and his colleagues that shows — independently of firm performance and size — the more money that people on the CEO's compensation committee make, the more they pay the CEO. Essentially, people use themselves as the standard to set pay.  Here is a key sentence from the post " O'Reilly and his colleagues report that for every $100,000 that
    the average member of the compensation committee is paid, the CEO's pay
    goes up another $51,000 per year."

     Of the eight comments, I especially liked Murthy's (a former student) detailed response, which ends with "When you become an investor, your
    job is to help and support companies to increase their shareholder
    value. Bashing them or their leadership to the public does not increase
    your shareholder value. If anything, it creates essentially the same
    emotional dynamic that any of us have when we have a jerk for a boss.
    So maybe a little less "I think wall street sucks" and a little more "I
    believe in the American financial system" would be useful for the
    morale of those companies as well as the morale of the country in
    general."

    March: My Final Exam Question: Can You Answer It?  This was about the final exam question that I have been using in my introduction to organizational behavior class for over a decade — in fact, Murthy answered it when he was student.  I will be using it again next term: "Design the ideal organization. Use course concepts to defend your answer."  For years, I told the students that it was really hard and I would have trouble answering.  I realized that I finally did answer it a few years back when I wrote The No Asshole Rule. Every year, I wonder if I should try something else, but then every year the best answers are so good that I can't resist asking it again.

    I suggested that, while the students get 3000 words, and The No Asshole Rule ran over 40,000 words, that if I was forced to write something short, I would say ""A place where people are competent, civilized, and cooperative — and
    tell the truth rather than spewing out lies and bullshit."  I would also add that this is pretty similar to how I define a good boss in my new book.

    The best part of this post were the 24 comments that people made about their vision of an ideal organization.  I can't resist picking two because they were so good. Whitney wrote "My ideal organization is one where I can have more positive impact in the world than I can accomplish on my own.I've worked for both kinds of companies. I left my last employer
    because group work took everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
    Where I work now, 1 + 1 usually adds to 3."  And Hayli wins the brevity award "Fewer meetings, more teamwork."

    April: A Well-Crafted Critique of Business "Success" Books and My Ambivalence About Good to Great.  This post was about Drake Bennett's article in the Boston Globe, which reviewed the weak evidence that underpins many management bestsellers — especially Good to Great.  Drake included a quote from me, ""There's value in mastering the obvious," he says. "If Jim Collins's
    impact is to get people to do stuff that they know they should do
    already – facing the hard truths or being selfless or whatever – I
    certainly don't think that's a bad thing." 

    As I explained in the post, I do think that Collins book is a good read and has helped many managers do a better job, but as someone who believes in and has written about evidence-based management, I am disturbed by the book because it makes such excessive claims about the quality of the research and newness of the ideas.  As I wrote in the post "ironically, this book about the virtues of modest leaders reveals considerable hubris in its claims." 

    Of the nine comments, I thought that Glenn's was especially thoughtful " I debate
    this with 'Collins Disciples' all the time. Also, I believe what adds
    to the issue is that too many people have stopped thinking. They read a
    book, follow it blindly, and believe they have all the answers. When
    they should read it, apply some critical thinking to see if and how it
    applies to their situation, then implement as appropriate." 

    May: Of Baboons and Bosses. This post dug into a claim in my June 2009 HBR article on "How to Be a Good Boss in a Bad Economy" that "the typical member looks at the the alpha make every 20 to 30 seconds to see what he is doing."  I linked this to research showing that subordinates are often hyper-focused on every little move that their bosses make — something that many bosses are remarkably oblivious to and that undermines their ability to lead effectively. 

    Of the five comments, I liked John Foster's best, notably his reminder that "leaders
    should always remember they are on stage, being "looked at" for cues.
    It's a powerful way to create movement or change."

    June: The Selfish Superstar Inventory.  The aim of this post was to ask for questions and ideas for a survey I was developing to assess if an organization breeds and rewards — or punishes and expels — selfish backstabbing superstars.  I suggested statements indicating that people who get ahead in such organizations do things like "stomp on colleagues on the way to the top" and "Are always loved by their superiors, but often despised
    by their peers and subordinates." 

    The 17 comments in response to this post were especially wonderful. My favorites include many on Tory's long list including "Scrub subordinates names from their work before passing it up the chain," Ed's "If a project fails, I don't feel bad if my part of it was successful," and Stu's 'Believe in the 30 Rock mantra, "I'm going to get mine!"'  A descendant of the "SSI" will appear in my new book and I will put out an online version around the time the book is published.  I used a lot of the suggestions, so thanks everyone!

    July: You Know Your Boss is A Certified Asshole When…..  I was inspired to write this post both because the ARSE continues to be completed by so many people (it is now well over 200,000 completions) and by a note I got from an executive who had an asshole boss that her kids called Mr. GIANT BUTTHOLE."  The responses to this questions from readers who wonderful, including Lesa's "Making a
    staff person drive 80 miles round trip at 9:00 pm at night to a
    client's house to get a (non-essential, non-urgent) signature because
    "we do whatever it takes to get the job done."  I also cringed at Ergoboy's "
    He
    corners every employee that you work with and interrogates them looking
    for dirt on you. Any possible dust particle gets wildly exaggerated,
    documented, and then shown to you on a write-up." 

    August: Wal-Mart and Girl Scout Cookies: Thin Minty Gate.  This post was inspired by CV Harquail's story about how Wal-Mart was test-marketing imitations of two of the best-selling Girl Scout cookies — a post that generated a lot of national media attention.  I expressed disgust with Wal-Mart's actions and I especially focused on why it was a bad business decision for them, taste and ethics aside.  I also warned readers that I was biased because my wife, Marina Park, is CEO of the Northern California Girl Scouts. I thought Cecelia summed it up well "The most
    important issue in this article is the community responsibility Walmart
    carries. (Or lack thereof in this case). It is in bad taste to go into
    direct competition with an organization they work closely with in order
    to provide a safe place for these girls to fund-raise. In communities
    where Walmart is already established, their profits exceed that of the
    local Girl Scout troop by a disgusting amount."  

    September:  What are the Dumbest Practices Used By U.S. Companies?   This one was pretty fun, as I asked for ideas for a speech I was going to give in Singapore. I started with three: 1. Dangerous complexity; 2. Dysfunctional internal competition, and 3. Breaking-up teams constantly.  Then 27 great comments roared in, including Pat's wise 'Rewarding Firefighters not Fire Inspectors.In other words, the people spotting the problems and fixing them
    before the "fire" do not get rewards. The "firefighters" who rush and
    put out fires in progress do get reward.'  I also loved Patricia's "Killing the messenger" and Rodney's ""When the
    risk of making a decision for employees inside the organization is
    considered to be greater than the benefit of making one."  I can't resist one more, Wally has made a lot of great comments this year, including "
    We hope
    for magical leadership instead of developing good systems. When we do
    develop systems we favor the engineered and the technological over the
    human and common-sensical."

    October: The post that probably had the most content was Challenging Ingrained Assumptions at HR, which summarized the short speech I ultimately gave in Singapore — and the 27 comments were great.  Dblwyo, for example,  was tough but (often) on target when he argued that "HR like many other functional specialties, e.g. IT and logistics, doesn't have more clout because it hasn't earned it."

    But I can't resist picking Art Imitates Life: The Muffin Incident on Entourage as the best post.   In this scene on the HBO show, my favorite TV asshole, Ari Gold fires an assistant for bringing him the wrong muffin — which is exactly what (according to the Wall Street Journal) Academy Award winning Producer Scott Rudin did to one of his assistants. There were only two comments, but I thought Tony summed-up Ari well "I am also
    a big fan of Ari Gold from Entourage. It is funny how such an
    ego-centric, manipulative character can be so interesting. Working with
    someone with his personality would be a nightmare but his aggressive
    drive is impressive." 

    November: Your Lack of Planning is Not My Emergency.   This is a saying I love.  This post generated seven comments, I especially liked Flint's comment "Or the corollary, "If everything is an emergency, then nothing is."  This was also the month where I did a bunch of posts on testosterone — including the study that showed young men who drive a new Porsche respond with higher levels but not when they drive an old Toyota Camry station wagon. 

    December: The Boss's Journey.  It was my last post, but it was my favorite because the comments were so good.   My argument was that  'As psychologist William Schutz
    explained, “Understanding evolves through three phases: simplistic, complex,
    and profoundly simple.”'  I suggested that 
    bosses might follow much the same journey. Wally, as usual, was spot on, commenting that  'Most
    "leadership development" programs are isolated courses that don't
    recognize that leadership development is cumulative. If you can help
    less experienced supervisors learn, use peer support to help them get
    vicarious experience, and teach them to use feedback and mentors, you
    can help them develop faster and more effectively.
    '  

    The Good Cop, Bad Cop Technique also generated some great comments, notably "culture guru," who reported "You just
    explained our parenting style, added at least another 10 years to our
    already 22 year old marriage, and have removed my final resistance to
    going into business with my husband."

    Congratulations if you have read this far. I suspect this is my longest post of the year.

    It's been quite a year. And now I am not the only blogger in the family.  My wife, Marina Park, now blogs regularly at SF Gate, the online arm of the San Francisco Chronicle, in the City Brights Section. I especially liked her recent post on Small Steps to Make the World a Better Place.

    I started writing Work Matters in June 2006. It  passed one million page views this year (1125533 as of this moment, with a lifetime average of 863 page views per day.)  It now includes 815 posts and 3195 of your comments.  Thanks for reading my stuff and thanks for all those wonderful comments.

    I hope you and yours have a happy new year.



  • Work Matters Hits One Million Lifetime Page Views

    I started writing Work Matters in June 2006.  Diego Rodriguez (of Metacool fame) and I were teaching a class called Creating Infectious Action, and Diego convinced me that — if I was interested in infectious action — I ought to start blogging.  Diego also correctly pointed out that I liked to write and seemed to have a short attention span, and thus was well-suited to blogging (an accurate observation).  I also got great early encouragement from Guy Kawasaki Todd Sattersten, Kent Blumberg, and Gretchen Rubin.   My first post (more accurately my second post, I think I deleted the very first one, which was just a short welcome) was called Brainstorming in the Wall Street Journal and was a response to an article that questioned the value of brainstorming — I was motivated to write it because academic researchers have taken such a narrow view of what "brainstorming effectiveness" means that it reflects severe ignorance of how and why brainstorming is used by real experts in real organizations.

    I knew that Work Matters was getting close to a million page views, but didn't expect it to happen so fast as this blog averages about 800 page views a day, but yesterday's post on my trip to Singapore and suspect HR assumptions apparently struck a nerve aa almost 5000 people visited yesterday (the most ever, I think). To be precise, Typepad statistics indicate that Work Matters has as of this moment 768 posts, 2863 comments (thank you!), an average of 822.60 page views per day (thank you), and a total of 1002748 lifetime page views. 

    I would like to thank everyone who has visited and commented on this blog and helped me in hundreds of other ways.  But I would especially like to thank a few readers out there — especially Rick — who have figured out that I am prone to producing typos and often unable to see them, and for taking the time to point them out. 

    I am not completely sure why I keep doing
    this, but it is fun, I have learned an enormous amount from the
    comments that people post and email me, and as 55 year-old guy with an
    increasingly bad memory, it is a great place to store all sorts of
    stuff that many readers aren't interested in but help me (like the list
    of 150 or so books that I like).
      Who knows how long I will keep doing this, but for now, I am still enjoying it a lot.