Tag: fear

  • Eliminating the Negative at the Atlanta Schools

    Today's New York Times has a compelling story about the steps new superintendent Erroll B. Davis Jr is taking to clean-up the Atlanta schools, which were tainted by test score scandals — with teachers and principals cheating in almost half the schools-– that was apparently fueled by pressure and fear created by the previous (and now disgraced) superintendent Beverly L. Hall.  As the Times explains:

    "For years, Beverly L. Hall, the former school superintendent here, ruled by fear. Principals were told that if state test scores did not go up enough, they would be fired — and 90 percent of them were removed in the decade of Dr. Hall’s reign.Underlings were humiliated during rallies at the Georgia Dome. Dr. Hall permitted principals with the highest test scores to sit up front near her, while sticking those with the lowest scores off to the side, in the bleachers."

    The interesting thing about the story to me is that Davis is behaving in ways that follow directly from one of my favorite academic articles, Bad is Stronger than Good.  He is working to eliminate the negative at every turn, immediately firing a teacher who allegedly supplied test scores students (he says he might get sued, but doesn't care), removing tainted senior administrators at a high rate, and during one of his many visits to schools he observed a toilet was clogged and made sure it was fixed before he left. He has also eliminated practices that Hall used that conveyed her superiority, isolation, and mistrust — she did things like insisting that all questions be submitted in writing when she spoke in public so they could be screened.

    Rather than her "Queen of the Ivory Tower" management style, Davis is out and about in the schools and the community eliminating the negative when he sees it, and as the psychologists who wrote "Bad is Stronger Than Good" advised,spreading around positive words and deeds at such a rapid pace that the negative is overwhelmed.

    Most notably, rather than hiding in his ivory tower, he is visiting school after school and thanking everyone he sees for their good work.  And rather than treating teachers as objects of scorn, blame, and mistrust, he says things to principals like “Education is the only industry in this country where failure is blamed on the workers, not the leadership.”

    Finally, Davis has made an interesting symbolic change to send the signal that helping kids, not jacking-up tests scores through any means possible, is what matters most.  The Times reports:

    "When Dr. Hall was the superintendent, she covered one wall in her office with bar graphs showing the test results for all 100 city schools. After Mr. Davis became superintendent, he took the test scores down and replaced them with large color photographs of Atlanta schoolchildren."

    As I noted here recently, my colleague Huggy Rao and I are working on book scaling-up excellence , and teach a related class at Stanford. One of the hallmarks of leaders who scale excellence is that they "make way" for it by removing bad behaviors and emotions that interfere with and turn attention and effort away from doing good things.  The methods that Erroll B. Davis Jr is using to turn around the Atlanta school system don't just provide lessons for other educational leaders, they demonstrate a mindset and actions that leaders of almost any group or organization can use to eliminate the negative — especially to drive-out fear. 

  • Fear-Based Performance Management at Fox News?

    Regardless of what you may think about Fox News, it is hard to argue with their commercial success.  Nonetheless, at least based on a leaked memo published over at Gawker, it appears that senior management is concerned about a rash of mistakes.  They are apparently responding by instituting a fear-based system. 

    I say "apparently" because I have no idea if this is actually written by Fox executives. Real or fake, it provides a good illustration of the kind of thing that seems reasonable, but that — at least if you believe the basic underpinnings of the quality movement (quality guru W. Edwards Deming's mantra was "Drive Out Fear") and related research by Amy Edmondson and others on psychological safety, mistakes, and learning — these are practices that aren't likely to eliminate mistakes, but they will amplify CYA behavior, brainstorming, and tendency to make the same mistakes over and over again.  I would add that perhaps they may increase personnel costs as people are fired for their mistakes, blamed and shown the door, and then new people come in and keep making the same mistakes because the system stifles learning. 

    Here is the alleged memo from the Fox executives.  Let me know what you think about it — would this work in your organization?

    Subject: Quality
    Control
    We had a mistake on Newsroom today when a wrong book cover
    went on screen during a guest segment, the kind of thing that can fall
    through the cracks on any day with any story given the large amount of
    elements and editorial we run through our broadcasts. Unfortunately, it
    is the latest in a series of mistakes on FNC in recent months. We have
    to all improve our performance in terms of ensuring error-free
    broadcasts. To that end, there was a meeting this afternoon between
    senior managers and the folks who run the daytime shows in which
    expectations were reviewed, and the following results were announced:
    Effective immediately, there is zero tolerance for on-screen errors.
    Mistakes by any member of the show team that end up on air may result in
    immediate disciplinary action against those who played significant
    roles in the "mistake chain," and those who supervise them. That may
    include warning letters to personnel files, suspensions, and other
    possible actions up to and including termination, and this will all
    obviously play a role in performance reviews.

    So we now face a great
    opportunity to review and improve on our workflow and quality control
    efforts. To make the most of that opportunity, effective immediately,
    Newsroom is going to "zero base" our newscast production. That means we
    will start by going to air with only the most essential, basic, and
    manageable elements. To share a key quote from today's meeting: "It is
    more important to get it right, than it is to get it on." We may then
    build up again slowly as deadlines and workloads allow so that we can be
    sure we can quality check everything before it makes air, and we never
    having to explain, retract, qualify or apologize again. Please know that
    jobs are on the line here. I can not stress that enough. I will review
    again during our Monday editorial meeting, and in the days and weeks
    ahead. This experience should make us stronger editorially, and I
    encourage everyone to invest themselves one hundred and ten percent in
    this effort.

    P.S. See this post on "The best diagnostic question" for a much different approach to learning from failure. Although I should note that there is another interesting element here: The memo implies that getting it right rather than getting done as quickly as possible will be rewarded more now –which is a step away from from fear and toward quality.