Author: supermoxie

  • Sticky Book Titles

    51wxkomegzl_aa240__2
    I
    was listening to a great show on the other day on Fresh Air, where Terry Gross
    interviewed Bob Sullivan, the author of Gotcha Capitalism.
    I started getting quite agitated
    by the interview, as Sullivan talked about all the ways that credit card
    companies, hotels, and especially, cell phone companies “get us” with hidden
    charges and related sleazy practices (listen to it here).

    It
    also reminded me of the time that my wife accepted an offer that was being pushed by Verizon
    salespeople for text messaging that sounded like a great deal. She was assured
    by the salespeople that this deal was good for as long the contract held. But after accepting the offer, my wife went
    online and read the terms of the offer on their website, which said it was a short-term deal
    that would revert to very high texting charges after (as I recall) three
    months. When she called back to cancel the deal and explain why, they resisted
    doing so and also kept accusing her of getting the facts wrong (even though she
    was reading them the contract, they didn’t believe her). So I think that Mr. Sullivan is onto to
    something (Indeed, one of the things I loved about Tranquilo Bay, the lovely  little eco-resort we went to in Panama, is
    there were no hidden charges, it was all inclusive, including the drinks).

    Mr.
    Sullivan not only gave a great interview, it got me thinking about how
    important book titles are to the success of a book. I love the title “Gotcha Capitalism,” as it captures the emotion so well. Perhaps I have a jaded view, but my two most
    successful books had titles that we decided on at the outset, and that we had
    to fight for to get past book marketing people. My co-author, Jeff Pfeffer, had a huge battle with the people from
    Harvard Business School Press about The
    Knowing-Doing Gap
    , the title that we used from the first day we started
    writing the book. They kept insisting that we call it “Louder Than Words.” And we
    almost rolled over (in fact, I have a framed copy of the Louder Than Words book jacket in my office). Then after Jeff talked
    to the CEO of another publishing company and he talked to Suzy Wetlaufer
    (then the deeply talented editor of the Harvard
    Business Review
    , now Suzy Welch, Jack’s wife), and both pressed
    Jeff to fight for the book title. And he fought hard, and won. 

    And,
    as Guy Kawasaki has written,
    as much as I love working with the people at Harvard Business School Press
    (despite the occasional disagreement), I decided to walk away and go to another
    publisher when they didn’t want to call it The
    No Asshole Rule
    . At the time, I commented
    that the title would likely be good for book sales, but I understood completely
    why they didn’t want to have a book with that title. Indeed, as I told them at the time, if I was
    them, I wouldn’t want the title either because it would be bad for their very respectable
    brand. But I couldn’t imagine, and still can’t imagine, that anything else
    would have grabbed attention so well.

    Of
    course, this is the kind of thing that Chip and Dan Heath write about in their
    great book Made to
    Stick.
      Picking a “sticky” book title isn’t easy as
    you want to have one that describes what the book is about, that surprises the
    reader a little, that provokes vivid images, and that readers will pick-up to
    look at, and will remember. I thought of
    a few of my favorites:

    Randy
    Komisar’s The Monk
    and the Riddle
    . A great title
    for this “anti-greed” book that appeared at the height of the dotcom boom.

    Timothy
    Ferriss’ The
    4-Hour Workweek.
    I confess I haven’t
    read the book, but it sounds good to me!

    Gordon
    MacKenzie’s Orbiting
    the Giant Hairball
    .
      As I have
    said many times here, the best corporate creativity book ever written.

    Harry
    Frankfurt’s On
    Bullshit
    .
    A title that clearly
    attracted attention, and without it, The
    No Asshole Rule
    would never have been published. Frankfurt paved the way
    for books with dirty titles that were written by professors from fancy universities
    (he is a retired Princeton philosopher).

    Arianna
    Huffington’s  Pigs
    at the Trough
    . I never read it, but what a great title!

    Jared
    Diamond’s Guns,
    Germs, and Steel
    . Great book and
    great title.

    David
    McCullough’s The Path
    Between the Seas.
    On the building of the Panama Canal. One of
    the best books I have ever read on anything. An astounding tale of human weakness
    and strength, and the power of sheer will. Wonderfully researched, and as good a story about the best and the worst
    features of the American character as you can find. Also, a reminder that some
    of the greatest innovations in history have been funded and implemented by
    governments.  The pyramids are another
    example! And, yes, both entailed
    exploiting a lot of people.

    51d7uy796l_bo2204203200_pisitbdp500
    I
    would love to hear some of your favorite titles as well.  And some of the stinkers too. One of the worst titles I’ve seen in recent
    years is The
    Complete Idiot’s Guide to Understanding Intelligent Design.
      Somehow, everything about it seems wrong. It sounds like a parody, but is not.

    P.S. As I said, I love the title of Gotcha Capitalism, but I am less enthusiastic about the cover design. Those colors a little bit too much for me, and also something about it undermines the seriousness of the subject.  On the other hand, if the goal was to design a cover that would stand-out, they succeeded.

  • Beyond the ARSE and Asshole Boss Detection System

    Eraser_2
    Guy Kawasaki and I put out some tools last year to help people figure-out of they are certified assholes or are considering going to work for one.  The ARSE, or Asshole Rating Self-Exam, has been completed by over 130,000 people.  We also developed the Asshole Boss Detection System with folks from Linked-in, a set of questions you can ask about your future boss behind his or back (just as they checking your references) to find out if, in fact, the person you are considering working for is a certified asshole.

    In this spirit, there have been a number of articles recently about how to tell if you work for a bad boss. On January 8th, The New York Times ran article called "Good Boss, Bad Boss, Which Are You."

    Here is an excerpt:

    To find out how good — or bad — a boss you are, the National
    Federation of Independent Business, a small business advocacy group,
    suggests asking yourself these questions:

    1. Have you ever publicly criticized an employee?

    2. Do you take credit for your employees’ work?

    3. Do your employees fear you?

    4. Do you expect employees to do what you tell them without question?

    5. Do you believe employees should know what to do without you telling them or providing guidelines?

    6. Are you a yeller?

    7. Do you demean employees as a form of punishment?

    8. Do you play favorites?

    9. Do you hate delegating?

    10. Do you check everyone’s work?

    According to the answer key, the more “yes” answers, the greater the likelihood you are a bad boss.

    Columntheoffice
    In addition, the article refers to a recent story by INC’s Leigh Buchanan (who also wrote about The No Asshole Rule in a funny article called "The Bully Rulebook.") Here is one sign of bad boss, according to Leigh: “You never see people walk by. Employees would rather circumnavigate
    the entire office to get to the coffee machine or bathroom than take
    the shortcut past your door and risk being invited in.”

    These surveys aren’t just fun. To me, the fact that people are writing about them is a good sign because it just might help drive incompetent and nasty bosses out of the workplace — in part, by helping bad bosses realize what they are doing wrong so they can change their ways.

    P.S. The first graphic is an eraser that my publisher used to promote The No Asshole Rule. The second graphic is from the INC story.

  • A Dangerous Gift

    At various times, I’ve been tempted to set-up ways so that The No Asshole Rule can be sent as a gift (sometimes anonymously and sometimes not) to send a not-so-subtle message to an asshole boss or co-worker.   I’ve always resisted the temptation, in part, because I worried that if people are already assholes, getting the gift might cause them to go after the messenger, rather than to take it is a sign that they or their organization could be infected with asshole poisoning.  Indeed, research on whistleblowers confirms this "shoot the messenger effect."  I got a hint of this risk some months back, when a woman wrote me that her asshole boss saw the book on her desk, and told her to take it home.  But I was quite dismayed to receive this email today (I print it as it was sent, but have removed some identifying information):

    Dear
    Bob,

    I bought a copy of The No Asshole
    Rule
    at an airport during a business trip. Reading the book, I figured out
    without doubt that I was a victim.

    Since being nominated for a new
    role, I was reporting temporarily to my tormentor’s boss. He is one of the most
    senior human resources executives within a large
    bank. Following more foul play from his direct report, and
    others, I decided to give him your book in the first edition version for
    Christmas. In my card, I wrote that I would like to speak to him about similar
    phenomena as depicted in your book within the context of our human resources
    department.

    He had me fired on the first working
    day of 2008 (a week ago) – without even getting the opportunity to talk. I am
    now in negotiations regarding the terms of my exit – and looking forward to a
    new and less asshole ridden life.

    Alas, I feel compelled to post this email as a warning to others; indeed, it seems that giving some assholes the book as a gift is dangerous because it turns them into even more flaming assholes.

  • No Asshole Rule Round-Up: Most Popular Article in the McKinsey Quarterly in 2007 and Other Tidbits

    1.
    The McKinsey Quarterly announced that
    my article based on The No Asshole Rule was their most popular article in 2007
    (I think this means it was the most downloaded). It is a somewhat censored version, called
    “Building the Civilized Workplace.” You
    can go here to get the article (registration is free). The Quarterly has very wide distribution and
    is read by many people who have the influence to actually implement the rule,
    so I am delighted that the message is being heard by their clients as well as
    within McKinsey, because they have so much influence over senior executives of
    large organizations throughout the world. Here are there top 5 articles for 2007:

    1. Building the civilized workplace

    2. How businesses are using Web 2.0: A McKinsey Global
    Survey

    3. The CEO’s role in leading transformation

    4. The halo effect, and other managerial delusions

    5. Investing in sustainability: An interview with Al Gore
    and David Blood

    2. Fast Company announced their list of
    the top 10 business books of the year, and I was happy to see that, in addition
    to The No Asshole Rule, Chip and Dan
    Heath’s Made to Stick was on the list as well. As I have written here many
    times before, if there ever was a book that deserved the label “instant
    classic,” Made to Stick is it.

    3.
    The India Times, which they tell me is one of the leading newspaper in India,
    also named The No Asshole as one of their top 10 business books of the
    year. I can’t find the URL but here is a pdf:

    Download times_managing_25_dec_2007_best_business_books.pdf

    2007_11_19_tanya
    4.The
    Russian version is about to appear. I have no idea what the above cover says,
    but it sure is wild.

    5. As I blogged about a few weeks ago, the new issue of the complete lawyer will be on workplace bullies. But you can get the articles already, as
    Victoria Pynchon tells us on her
    blog.
    Victoria’s article is stunning, scary, brave, and remarkably
    insightful. Perhaps the most honest and
    compelling piece I’ve ever read about how the pressures that lawyers face can
    provoke asshole poisioning. Check it out, here is how Victoria describes it:

    “My article Why
    Lawyers Are Unhappy… And Make Others Unhappy, Too
    is a
    personal confessional of workplace misbehavior. In fact, it’s just about
    as personal as you can get without committing professional suicide.
    But hey!  Somebody had
    to fess up and when you’re  the
    jerk in the workplace, it’s you who
    is usually the last to
    know.  As my regular readers know, however, there is a happy ending to
    this one.” 

    6.
    Indeed, if you want some brand new evidence about why lawyers are so uptight,
    check out this story about the lawyers from Morrison & Forester (aka MoFo) who cost their client 1 million dollars
    for filing some papers 1 minute late. (I
    suspect that the firm will be paying, not their clients). See this WSJ
    story.
    I also think it is
    interesting that the MoFo lawyers aren’t getting much sympathy from some of the
    commentors.

    7.
    I have also had readers point me to some interesting stories in the media about
    workplace assholes, including one on called “Easing Angst
    in Business Today (published in
    India), a well-crafted story by Jane Leder (who interviewed me months ago) in
    North Shore Magazine called Emergency
    Exit
    , a story in Voir
    about the French Canadian version of the No Asshole Rule,
    Objectif
    Zéro Chien Sale
    (which means, roughly, “no more dirty dogs”).  Finally, The New York Post listed The No Asshole Rule as one of their  notable books of 2007, but were careful to say that they weren’t all good books.  I am not quite sure how to take that!

    More
    is happening. In particular, I am developing a version of the ARSE (Asshole
    Rating Self-Exam)
    that will be used to assess if, in fact, the client you are
    working for is a certified asshole. If
    you have any ideas about sure signs that a client is, or is going to become, an
    asshole, please let me know.

     

  • Sailing Down The Street in Menlo Park

    Laser_sailing

    My family just got back from a wonderful vacation in Panama, at a little resort (six cabins or "cabanas") called Tranquilo Bay. I will put up an extended post about it, as it is one of the best vacations my family ever had. And the story of the two lovely families that run the place is among the most inspiring I have ever heard.  The sacrifices that entrepreneurs make here in Silicon Valley seem trivial by comparison.  For example, Jay and Jim, two guys who had a dream to have a Caribbean resort, quit their jobs at big companies and CAMPED for 5 years while they built Tranquilo Bay in on an island in the middle of a rain forest.  People talk about working "24/7" here to get their start-ups off the ground, but these guys took it to an entirely different level.

    Meanwhile, while we were gone, it rained like hell in Northern California. The picture of the guy sailing a Laser down the flooded street was taken about three blocks from our house in Menlo Park, California.  The power was out at our house a lot, but all is fine. Check out the rest of the story in the Almanac. Apparently, we chose a good week to get out of town.

    Laser_ii

  • 2007 at Work Matters: More Favorites

    It
    wasn’t all "no asshole rule" all the time in 2007. We talked about a lot of other topics related to the workplace,
    especially innovation and creativity, the Stanford d.school, evidence-based
    management, and what it takes to turn knowledge into action. As I looked back at the year, a dozen
    favorite posts and themes came to mind.

    1.
    Gus
    Bitdinger’s Innovation Song
    . My favorite
    book on innovation in big companies is Orbiting the Giant Hairball. We used
    it in a class that Michael
    Dearing
    and I taught last winter called “Innovation and Implementation in
    Large Organizations.” As a final assignment,  we gave students the crazy assignment of
    making a little film that summarized what they learned. Most of the students surprised
    us by doing better work that we had hoped. But Gus just knocked us out with this video, called “Back
    in Orbit,” which is a remarkably complete and engaging summary of the
    book.

    2.
    Why
    Sham Employee Participation Is Worse Than No Participation at All
    . I devoted a lot of time to writing this post because
    too many leaders create processes that require employees to spend hours and
    hours of their time making suggestions about how everything from administrative
    practices to product design, but they have no intention of ever actually
    listening to the employees. After an
    analysis of the problem of why so many leaders feel compelled to use such “sham
    participation,” I made some potentially obnoxious suggestions to leaders,
    followers, and users who are involved in these charades. For example:  “If you, as an administrator, feel compelled
    to still have a symbolic process to point to, if you feel compelled to engage
    in sham participation anyway, appoint a small committee of employees and select
    people who aren’t doing anything especially valuable anyway.  Also, hold
    just a few short meetings. That way, the productivity of the organization will
    suffer as little as possible.”

     

    24825bpthesimpsonshomertryingispost


















    3.
    Failure
    Sucks But Instructs.
    I love this
    cartoon, and the message that goes with it.  This is one of the guidelines that Diego and use
    to teach design thinking.

     

    Img_0053

    4. NASCAR
    Fun at the Customer-Focused Innovation Program.
    We had the Andy Papa of Hendrick’s Motor
    Sports visit both Stanford twice (Once to executives and once to d.school
    students) to teach about how “innovation under constraint” happens at NASCAR,
    and both times, he brought by real racing cars to people could have an
    authentic pit crew experience (or part of one). It wasn’t just a lot of fun, we
    all learned something about how more constraints can sometimes fuel innovation.

     

    Dschool_manifesto_napkin_1_25. Min Liu’s comments on Why
    The d.school Works.
    After taking a
    d.school called Clicks-n-Bricks, where the focus was on fueling sustainability awareness
    within Walmart, Min wrote a touching and most insightful post. She was probably too nice. We had some
    serious problems getting this project going, but in the end, the students did a
    fantastic job (sometimes this happens despite rather than because of the
    teaching staff!).  This post also has
    links to the presentations that our students gave at Wal-Mart.  As Min wrote:

    “Personally, my last quarter at Stanford was the best because I
    learned that the process of doing what I love (finally!) is so much better than
    living up to some abstract expectation even though it is, by convention, the
    best. Sure, the realization was a good part done by myself outside of the
    d.school, but it was d.school’s welcoming, innovative, and incubati
    ve
    environment that helped me realize that the riskier and gutsy-er a path is, the
    better.”


    6. Why
    "It is the Industry Standard" is a Dumb Excuse.
    I had a bad customer service experience when I
    tried to cancel an order for an HP laptop. As I said then, I believe now, I generally have a high opinion of HP
    products and service experiences. But I
    was quite unhappy when the person I called defended an HP policy (that I thought
    was absurd) by saying “it is industry standard.” It seemed to me like saying ‘we are all
    idiots,” “we all don’t care about our
    customers,” or perhaps (to paraphrase the old saying) “We all think alike, so
    none us thinks very much.”  My parents taught me that “but the other kids
    do it too” was a completely unacceptable excuse for bad behavior. Too bad that leaders of some of our biggest
    companies sometimes forget that lesson.

    Girl_scouts_2
    7.
    My CEO: Marina Park’s New Job at The Girl Scouts.
    On the home front, my wife, Marina Park, spent
    most of the year trying to decide what she wanted to next with her life after 8
    years of managing partner of a big law firm. She considered jobs as a general
    counsel at several public companies, becoming a law firm strategy consultant, and
    going back to practice. She realized,
    however, that she had enough of the law and law firms and wanted to do
    something different, to be part of something that mattered more given her
    values. She has been CEO of the Northern California Girl Scouts for about two
    months now. There is a lot to do, as a
    complex five-way merger that created the Northern California Girl Scouts was
    made official on October 1. Marina loves
    the work and the people she works with.

    8. Do
    You Need a Penis to Qualify as a B School All Star?
    I admit that I was flattered to selected by BusinessWeek as one of “10
    B-school professors who are influencing contemporary business thinking beyond
    the halls of academia.” 
    I am
    not actually a b-school professor, but as I do teach management in a school of
    engineering, I guess that is close enough.  I was quite disturbed, however, to see that
    there were no women on the list of so-called all stars. From what I could tell,
    all us were Caucasian as well. Perhaps it was unwise to complain about BusienssWeek’s kindness to me. Indeed, I got an email suggesting that it was
    unwise to “bite the hand that feeds you.” But that parade of 10 all-white men still bothers me, as they are plenty
    of women and non-white management professors who are making a big impact.

    9.
    The Evidence-Based
    Management Movement Keeps Rolling Along
    . I’ve written quite a bit about evidence-based management here, including
    a post on research showing that believing
    your IQ is malleable
    makes it more malleable, one on how
    utterly useless graphology (handwriting analysis) is
    for screening
    employees, and on evidence-based
    management isn’t just about quantative evidence.
    Jeff Pfeffer and I also have – with a huge
    amount of help from Daphne Chang at the Stanford Business School – continued to
    add all kinds of new content to www.evidence-basedmanagement.com,
    including some nice guest columns such as
    Professor Phil Rosenzweig’s piece of The
    Halo Effect
    and DaVita COO Joe Mello’s piece of The Myth
    of the Mean
    .  We also got some nice
    coverage for Hard
    Facts
    in BusinessWeek
    and The Wall
    Street Journal
    .  Jeff and I will keep
    adding to evidence-basedmanagement.com,
    and in fact, have several guest columns that we will be rolling out over the
    next month or so.

    10.
    A
    Three-part Series at Harvard Business Online on Layoffs.
    I decided to end my brief career as an HBS
    blogger because I just had too many other things to do, and frankly, I found it
    a weirdly constraining format. But I did
    develop a fairly detailed – and evidence-based –point of view on layoffs.  As I explained on this blog:  ‘I was interviewed by Carol Hymowitz at the Wall Street Journal for a story
    called, "Though
    Now Routine, Bosses Still Stumble During the Layoff Process
    ," about a
    month ago.  Talking with Carol inspired me to go back and review some of
    the old and new research on organizational decline for a series of posts that I
    did on layoffs for Harvard Business Online (See 1,
    2,
    and 3).
    I spent a lot of time thinking about these challenges at one point, as my
    earliest stream of research was on organizational decline and death (My
    dissertation was on the
    process of organizational death
    ), and in 1988 Kim Cameron, Dave Whetten,
    and I published a (now out of print) collection of readings on organizational
    decline.
    I also published quite a few academic articles on the topic,
    including (with Stan Harris) what might still be the only study of
    funerals for dying organizations.

    Alas,
    with a possible recession on the way, I fear that this topic may be even more
    pertinent in 2008. Don’t forget the Bain
    study
    of layoffs during the last recession: When firms avoid doing layoffs,
    they tend to recover more quickly than firms that use layoffs.

     Reese
    11.
    Successful Stanford Dropouts: Quitters Sometimes Prosper.
    This one was really fun, as there are times
    when quitting isn’t just an option, it is the best option! Ask Tiger
    Woods and Reese Witherspoon.

     

    Realists_and_idealists





    12
    . Realists
    vs. Idealists.
    I love this one mostly because the graphic is so cool. It also matches the message in Orbiting the Giant Hairball extremely
    well. And, as I argue in the post, a case can be made that too much realism can
    hamper innovation. We all need to dream
    and, as Jim
    March argues so well
    , even though dreamers fail at an alarming rate, we are
    all better off for them – even the most hard-core of realists.

    Finally, I’d like to mention 15
    Things I Believe
    . I started these as a New Year’s post last year about 10
    Things I Believe
    , and have tinkered with these ideas throughout the year.  Some are evidence-based, others are more a
    reflection of what I value and hope for in life. They are listed to the left or
    you can click on the link to get to a post that has the most recent list too.

    I
    am off until next year, and look forward to 2008 at Work Matters. Be well and,
    as always, I’d love to hear your comments. In particular, if I left out something good – or especially awful – let me
    know. And also let me know what you might
    want to hear more about next year.

  • 2007 at Work Matters: The Year of the Workplace Asshole

    1np0371z0326

    I’ve
    always liked the tradition of using this time of year as a chance to reflect. For me, this was the
    Wwwreuterscom_3
    year of The No Asshole Rule, so I
    will devote this post to that one and the next other topics.  I never expected so many people to buy this
    little book about workplace assholes in the United
    States
    , let alone in France,
    Germany,
    and Italy;
    and I was shocked when it won the Quill Award. And the rate at which related stories,
    research, and “asshole management” methods were sent to me – and are sent to me
    now – still astounds me.

    It is hard to
    pick my favorite “asshole-related moments,” but I will try.  I am also weaving in some of my favorite  pictures. The one at the top is from The New York Post (which published a series of related
    stories) and the cry baby bully is from a Reuters story.

    Bullygif_lisa_haney
    1.
    I never expected over 130,000 people to complete the ARSE (Asshole-Rating Self
    Exam)
    . A big part of the reason is Guy Kawasaki’s magical touch. The
    stories that people tell me about the ARSE are sometimes funny, and other
    times, kind of scary. Like this one about the guy who quite his job right after
    completing it for his VP,
    who scored 23 out of 24
    . I also enjoyed playing with some other web toys,
    including ARSEmail and the Flying ARSE, and although about 10,000
    people have completed each, neither has quite touched a nerve in the same way
    as the original ARSE. Stay tuned, early
    next year, we will have a new web toy, to help you assess if you have a client
    from hell (or if you are one).  Also, the picture of the bully is by Lisa Haney.  

    Aa
    2.
    I received a lot of ideas from readers and fellow bloggers who helped me develop
    and keep refining a set of tips
    for surviving workplace assholes
    . I especially want to thank the government
    worker who showed us the power of keeping “asshole
    diaries”
    to document the behavior of the local bully, and was able to
    triumph in large part because she was able to recruit several others oppressed
    co-workers to do the same, and then present the evidence to their supervisor.
    It reminded me of Arlo Guthrie’s old song Alice’s
    Restaurant
    ; if one person tries to fight back, the organization treats you
    like you are nuts; if a whole bunch fight back together, then the chances that
    you will be taken seriously are a lot higher. And pretty much the same point is supported by Professor Pamela Lutgen-Sandvik’s research on
    fighting back against bullies. (The graphic is from a Value Rich story, which contained pictures designed to be inserted into various pages of The No Asshole Rule; this one is supposed to go on page 119). 

    Button
    3. I received many emails
    and wrote many posts from people who complained about being oppressed by
    assholes, and certainly, as this survey and especially this survey show, there
    are a lot of assholes out there, and a growing body of research documents the
    damage done. But a point that sometimes gets lost is that any of us, under the
    wrong conditions, can turn into at least temporary assholes. Indeed, one of the
    last points of the book is that “assholes are use.”  This is one of the main implications of
    research on power, as I wrote about here. And see this the post
    here to see why there is the strange picture of the guy with an "E" drawn on his head both backwards and forwards below. 

    Other_focused
    I also learned a lot from the over 350 answers
    and comments in response to my question on
    the Linked-in blog
    : " As people become more powerful, there’s a tendency
    for bad behavior to surface. What suggestions do you have for leaders to avoid
    becoming a jerk in the face of rising pressure and demands?"    But I
    thought that the most insightful comment on the challenges of keeping one’s inner jerk in check was David
    Maister’s list of “I’ve been an asshole when.” I applaud David’s honesty and courage.  For better or worse, the things on David’s
    list apply to me pretty well too:

    I got overexcited and overenthused on a topic (I lose my sense of proportion , just keep trying to make my point and don’t let people finish their sentences).
    I got tired.
    Three things went wrong in a row. Two I can handle, but make it three and I lose it.


    I was asked to do more than one thing at a time. I’m not a multitasker, and I get cranky when people interrupt my concentration.


    Igot criticized too directly (I reacted badly).

    I felt like I’m not being treated with respect.

    I was trying too hard to ‘show off.

    Breed
    4.
    There were some pretty
    funny moments too. Like the brilliant letter
    to the San Francisco Chronicle
    complaining about the title of my book. Or Mark
    Fortier’s style guide
    for people in the media who interview me, but are squeamish
    about the title. Or the picture to the left from Value Rich that illustrates how assholes breed like rabbits (It is supposed to be inserted on page 66). And the post about the day that the The No Asshole Rule was used in the bible
    studies class
    , I confess, struck me as funny at first, until I realized how
    serious and wise Richard Beck’s application of the ideas were (see my last
    post for more). But the one that made me laugh the hardest was probably the “lovely
    moment in the MBA classroom,”
    passed along by C.K. Gunsalus. Here is the key part:

    We had a lovely moment in class today you might
    appreciate.  We had a guest speaker, who had scanned the syllabus upon
    arriving in the classroom. The speaker said, at one point, something along the lines of "I see you’re
    reading a book by Bob Sutton with a word in the title I simply detest." An unidentified student in the back of the room (there are more than 100 people
    in this class) yelled out:
    "Yeah, I hate the word
    ‘rule’, too,"

    Copy_of_button
    5.
    Perhaps the most heartening thing I learned was how many organizations were
    already using The No Asshole Rule, or
    similar rules. The "no assholes rule at SuccessFactors got the
    most attention (You can read about in the
    McKinsey Quarterly
    , hear about it on KFOG, or see it on MSNBC). I also liked the The
    No Dickhead Rule at Arup
    and Lou Pepper’s story about how the applied the
    rule during the years he was CEO of Washington Mutual – you can read about
    these and other examples of places with the rule here.  And I was also heartened by the dozens of people who told me that the book
    helped give them courage to quit a job where they had a vile boss or
    co-workers.  I wrote the book to encourage organizations to treat people in more civilized ways and to
    encourage people who are trapped in nasty workplaces to fight back effectively, and failing
    that, find ways to get out if they possibly can.

    Finally,
    I would like to give special thanks to fellow bloggers who wrote such supportive
    things about the book during the past year or so, and sent me so many warm and constructive notes that usually didn’t appear on this blog, but helped my a great deal  Please forgive me if I have left
    you out, I am trying to remember as well as I can. This is a very incomplete list, hundreds of other bloggers have helped me who aren’t mentioned). These include:

    Diego
    at Metacool

    Guy at Change
    the World

    Krishna
    at Thought Clusters

    Gretchen
    at the Happiness Project

    Jeff
    at Management By Baseball

    Pam
    at Escape from Cubicle Nation

    Frank
    over at KnowHR

    Maureen
    at Pink Slip

    Kent
    Blumberg

    Polly LaBarre at Mavericks

    Julie
    at Life-At-The Bar

    David
    Maister

    Sig
    at Thingamy

    Alexander
    at the Chief Happiness Officer

    Todd at 800
    CEO-Read

    The
    Jackson Library Blog

    Lisa at
    the Time Magazine Blog

    Loren
    at the Busybody

    IL Metodo Antistronzi (Italian
    Edition Blog)

    Chuck
    at Third Wave

    Don
    at Audiobook Maven

    Objectif Zero Sale Con  (French Edition Blog)

    Brayden
    at Org.theory.net

    I
    could go on and on, an again, I am sorry
    to those I’ve left out. I appreciate the
    support from everyone, and the criticisms too. On to 2008!


    Dead_fish
    P.S. The picture above of a dead fish on a keyboard is from a story about the book in a German magazine gets my vote for the weirdest of them all. 

     

  • The No Asshole Rule Goes to Bible Studies Class: Richard Beck at Experimental Theology Looks Back

    A lot of surprising things happened in response to the publication of The No Asshole Rule. I am putting together a post or two about some of the highlights and biggest lessons that I learned this year.  But perhaps nothing surprised me, or forced me to open my mind more, than experimental psychologist Richard Beck’s use of The No Asshole Rule in a bible studies class in Texas, which he wrote about on his blog Experimental Theology.  Here is Richard’s retrospective on this experience, which is part of his  post on the Best of 2007. I find his comment wonderful and deeply constructive in many ways, and very much in the Christmas spirit:

    #7
    My Bible Class about Bob Sutton’s Book

    No retrospective on 2007 would be complete without facing up to my Most
    Controversial Post of the Year
    . I did a bible class at my church on Dr.
    Sutton’s book and then followed that post up with a series. That post was
    picked up on by Dr. Sutton (initially
    here on his personal blog
    and then later in The Huffington Post
    where he mentions his changing attitudes about Christians in two features found
    here and here.
    Which pleases me in that, if you look at his remarks, it seems I helped
    dismantle some stereotypes about Christians and Christian intellectuals.

    These gains aside however, because I didn’t euphemize and took Dr. Sutton’s
    language as-is (following the lead, as a scholar would, of the Harvard
    Business Review
    who first published Dr. Sutton’s idea), some conservative
    readers have been offended and have written my employer about my Christian
    commitment. The disappointing part for me is that none of these complaints have
    been taken directly to me per Jesus’ instructions in the Sermon on the Mount.
    Which means that the complaints are not Christian, honest, and truth-seeking in
    intent. They are, rather, attempts to use my post as a political tool against
    my university. Which is sad. To those offended by this blog, please e-mail me
    directly for conversation. Also note that my discussion of Dr. Sutton’s book
    had nothing to do with my university as it was a bible class for my church,
    populated with adults and not college students. Thus, if you have any spiritual
    concerns with me on this topic please contact my spiritual overseers, the
    elders of the Highland Church of
    Christ
    . They are the ones accountable for both my spiritual journey as well
    as any teaching conducted under their oversight.

    As a final thought on this subject, a part of the reason (other than its clear
    gospel message) I took up Dr. Sutton’s book was to explore what "Christian
    language" can and should look like. What are the discernment issues
    involved? How do we adjudicate? Is propriety and politeness the main concern?
    But what if, as Dr. Sutton’s book shows, cultural mores are changing? Is this a
    generational issue? If so, should language change to connect with the young
    even if the older (and most established in faith) are offended? These are
    challenging and important issues. How shall we speak to our world? Is the world
    a homogenous crowd allowing only a single form of Christian discourse? Or is
    the world heterogeneous, diverse, and ramified, requiring multiple languages
    each unique given context and audience? In short, all readers here–offended or
    not offended–should pitch in and discuss rather than gripe and
    complain. There is work to be done for the Kingdom! Let’s find out how best to
    do it and support each other in a process–being in but not of the world–that
    necessarily creates different modes of missional living.

    Richard, thank you so much for being so thoughtful and open-minded.  I especially like your call for constructive discussion and argument — it reminds me of one on of my favorite sayings by fellow psychologist Karl Weick: Fight as if you are right, listen as if you are wrong!

  • Worst Employees of the Year

    This CNN.Com story is pretty sick.  Funny in some places, but deeply troubling in others.  The absolute worst employees I ever dealt with are at Air France.  If my experience is representative, they are openly hostile and proud of their incompetence. In The No Asshole Rule, I talk about why I once had strategic temper tantrum at six Air France employees who were so busy talking to each other that they seemed to totally forget that dealing with customers was part of their job.  I was a bit concerned that my French publisher would be unhappy about putting this story in the French version of the book, Objectif Zéro-sale-con. I didn’t know whether to be relieved or upset when they told me that Air France was infamous for bad service, especially toward people who don’t speak French!

    Fry’s Electronics in Palo Alto is a runner-up for me. They aren’t hostile, just hapless and poorly trained.  My experience is that they are always trying to sell you things that you don’t need, including accessories that don’t work with the camera, TV, or whatever you are buying from them. The saving grace at Fry’s is the customers.  There are a lot of very knowledgeable and helpful people in Palo Alto; indeed, I’ve witnessed (and benefited from) customers who interrupt and correct Fry’s employees who are giving bad advice!

    To return to the CNN story, here are of my favorite pair of bad examples from the story:

    Forget about clients

    The last employee to leave a
    child’s day care center in Dallas accidentally left a 14-month-old girl
    locked inside alone; not realizing the child was still there. The girl
    was found safe and sound, according to police reports. (Source: The
    Associated Press)

    In a separate incident, while a 73-year-old
    woman looked through her safe deposit box, employees of a California
    Bank of America accidentally locked her in the building, according to
    authorities. The cleaning person called police when she found the woman
    unconscious and cold to the touch. The woman apparently passed out
    because she hadn’t taken her diabetes medication. (Source: The
    Associated Press, MSNBC.com)

    P.S. An important footnote. Employees who are this incompetent usually act this way because they are victims of a bad system, bad management, or both.  As I’ve emphasized here before, when leaders focus on getting rid of crappy systems, the problems with "bad people" often evaporate.  Although I should hasten to add that even the greatest companies have a few "bad apples."

  • Asshole Toxic Shock Syndrome in Japan

    I got this scary and
    insightful email earlier in the week. I
    am often asked if The No
    Asshole Rule
    applies in other cultures. The reactions that I’ve received from
    Europe (especially France, Italy, Germany, and the UK), as well as from India,  suggest that the ideas do transfer to at least some cultures. But I have been less sure about Asian countries, so
    this note is particularly interesting. It sounds like, at least in some corners of Japanese business, the ideas strike a nerve.

    I would be especially
    interested to hear comments from other people who work in Japan, or who have
    extensive experience with Japanese companies or business people. Here goes:   

    Dear Bob,

    I am a Tokyo-based HR consultant and executive coach.

    I became aware of the NAR in Feb/07, and received my copy from
    Amazon in March. I read it cover to cover in one sitting, and
    ordered copies for my friends, mostly HR directors and talent
    managers occupying seats in foreign-owned MNC’s. I ‘leaf’ a lot of
    business books, we all do, but NEVER have I seen a book capture the
    popular imagination as did and does the NAR. For the first time, in a
    longtime, we ‘laughed’. After we laughed, we experienced an
    added catharsis in sharing tales of AH behavior (individual and organizational).
    And, this would be AH behavior of a particularly virulent form, what
    happens when:  Western managers bring a simplistic and short-term
    perspective to complex business and cultural challenges; Japanese managers
    utilize ‘ijime’ (bullying) to effect restructuring that would be proscribed by
    a labor code that is very protective of worker rights.

    I scrolled through reader messages on your blog, and tragic as
    many of these stories are, I could not find one that compares to the
    image of a Japanese manager hanging dead in the company stairwell,
    his final message to his AH boss. (That boss popped up on my
    screen again recently with regard to another incident in another
    company.) I could tick off dozens of these stories; a few end in death; a
    significant number end in long-term depression leaves, derailed careers,
    derailed lives.

    The ‘treatment’ of workplace depression, what I now call,
    ‘Asshole Toxic Shock Syndrome’ (AHTSS) is big business in Japan. I think this
    is opportunistic and ‘bad’ business: opportunistic because it does not address
    the problem, but shifts the focus to treatment of its ‘victims’;
    bad because Japan is talent-starved, and its organizations need to retain
    and develop every warm body they can get their hands on. Under ‘bad’ I would also subsume diversity,
    inclusion and other ‘why can’t we all just get along’ initiatives that spill
    forth from the U.S. It seems to me the
    better question is:

    “Why can’t we ensure civility in the workplace? Why are Japanese streets the safest in the
    world, and its work environments becoming some of the more lethal?”

    I began experimenting with the NAR as part of my coaching
    practice, and thus far, have found two applications:

    1) To assist clients suffering from ‘AHTSS’ to understand that
    it is ‘not them’. One such client,
    a particularly plucky soul, bought a dozen copies and seeded them
    throughout her organization. She, an expatriate
    manager leading a multi-cultural team in a European MNC, reported that the NAR
    transcends culture, was an ‘idea’ the diverse constituents of her team could
    readily agree upon. And, this took the NAR into the realm of OD. That the book
    is written in simple language, absent jargon, and printed in a large typeface
    means Japanese and other ESL folks can read it too. You book gained greater organizational access
    than any consultant could.

    2) To treat AH behavior, ’cause wouldn’t you bet my coaching
    practice is full of ‘0-empathy technocrats’ who are challenged to manage
    other human beings.  I have explored this application VERY
    tentatively, as one would. I am
    pleased to report that by calling a spade a spade, as in "[Client], you
    are a very talented fellow, but your AH behavior is undermining your ability to
    get things done" has wrought miracles. When I stopped equivocating, they started listening! And, a few have taken the NAR to heart and
    are practicing.

    The NAR has transformed my practice, and convinced me that
    seemingly intractable problems are amenable to common sense solutions.

    Again,
    I invite comments. It also sounds like
    this HR consultant is employing some of the techniques suggested in Crucial
    Conversations
    and Taming
    the Abrasive Manager
    , both excellent books.