Author: supermoxie

  • Wisdom from Professor Rao

    I was talking on the phone with Hayagreeva (aka "Huggy") Rao today about a project we are working on, and he said something wonderful "Smart organizations make difficult things simple."

    The first thing that came to mind was an experience I had about 2 years ago where I first set-up a new Dell Computer, which took me about 4 hours and entailed plugging in seemingly endless number of wires and opening about 10 boxes. Then I set-up a new Mac, which involved opening one box and took about 10 minutes. I also thought of McDonald's which, although not exactly the most politically correct organization, has done a simply brilliant job of scaling-up its brand and stores (with brilliant local customization). Finally, I couldn't help but think of the simply awful experience that I had with ATT setting-up Internet and phone service recently — I was sufficiently disgusted with them (I spent a total of 4 hours on the phone and was given constant misinformation and they made an astounding number of errors) that I canceled everything and switched to Comcast. ATT, at least from what I experienced, is the master of making simple things complicated.

    I'd love to hear other examples of organizations that "make difficult things simple."  I think it is wonderful standard for judging an organization — or a leader or teacher.

    P.S. I encourage you to read Andrew's comment below, it is inspired.

  • The Civility Solution

    What-to-do-when-people-are-rude-pm-forni
    I have been writing a fair amount lately (and, as a result,blogging a bit less), including an innovation article for the McKinsey Quarterly on innovation that will appear soon and the BusinessWeek essay discussed in my last post — and most of all — working to get my next book started. For me, the writing process involves reading books from diverse sources.  I thought it would be fun to point to three of the best books I've read lately. The first is P.M. Forni's The Civility Solution: What to Do When People Are Rude. Professor Forni is a professor at Johns Hopkins University and, as I have written here, has been leading a cvility movement in Maryland for the last few years.  It is a charming and well-written book. I especially like how Professsor Forni provides such constructive and careful guidance about how to handle the small moments of rudeness that occur so often in life — not only those moments when other people are rude to us, but also when we are rude to them.  As I've emphasized in The No Asshole Rule, the development and enforcement of this, or any other social norms, doesn't happen through broad pronouncement, but rather, in the little moments that either reinforce or undermine the norm.  The other thing I like about the book is that Professor Forni's personal charm and wisdom makes the book a delight to read.  I found that his warm gentle spirit inspired me to want to be more civil, not just the the content of the great advice and stories that he provides in this book.  This is a lovely and very practical book.

  • BusinessWeek Issue on Trouble at the Office

    0814_mz_cover

    The brand new BusinessWeek is on "Trouble at the Office."  As I wrote here a couple months back, much of the content for the issue was created in collaboration with readers, including a series of blogs that BusinessWeek established with the primary aim of developing content for this issue.  The issue is now out online and it has everything from an interview with the Office's Rainn Wilson on jobs from hell to Jim Collins on Good to Great Expectations.  I contributed an essay on forces that will turn you into a jerk and how to overcome them — called "Are You Being a Jerk, Again."   This essay reflects themes that I've talked about in more depth in this blog including power (see here and here) and emotional contagion. It is a fun issue and I have to give BusinessWeek credit for trying something so different.

    P.S. The weirdest part for me is that the story contains a huge artists rendering of me, which makes me nervous, in part, because that is the kind of attention that turns people into self-centered assholes.  Please do not hesitate to let me know if you notice that I start acting like a jerk.   

  • The Tape Method

    Duct_tape

    I was just talking to an executive coach and consultant from Colorado, and she told me a funny and instructive story about how she helped a client deal with his emotional outbursts and table pounding at meetings.  She would go to meetings with him and sat next to him.  She brought a roll of tape along with her. When her client got up to speak, she used an "escalating" four-step warning system to control his behavior:

    1. At the first sign of excessive anger, she would would take the roll of tape out and put it on the table next to him.

    2. If he didn't calm down — or started getting even more irate — she would turn it on edge and roll it around a bit as a stronger reminder.

    3. If he still was losing it — perhaps starting to pound the table as he sometimes did — she would start peeling off a piece of tape and made sure that he noticed it was happening.

    4. If all else failed, she would stand-up and put a piece of tape on his mouth.

    She reported that step 4 was never actually used, but that she got to step 3 quite a few times.  She also reported that — because this client had a sense of humor and because he really wanted to stop his outbursts — this method was quite effective.  Ultimately, along with some other methods that they worked out to help him maintain control, he was able to massively curtail the frequency and intensity of his outbursts at meetings.

    Finally, she also emphasized that most of the "constructive coaching" jobs she did with executives over the years weren't this much fun, and unlike this client, were often with executives who were unable or unwilling to change.  But I do like this story and I have to give her a lot credit for inventing the tape method and the client a lot of credit for being willing to have it used on him.

    P.S. You can buy the duct tape poster here as well as some related goodies.

     

  • The Onion and The No Asshole Rule

    Onion
     The Onion seems to have discovered the no asshole rule and related work.  I love their little article and confess that they are on target. The notion that workplace assholes do damage is stunningly obvious.  But as I have written here before, the best leaders and organizations are often masters of the obvious. And as Jeff Pfeffer and I wrote in The Knowing-Doing Gap, one of the great puzzles of organizational life is why so many managers know what they and their colleagues ought to do build more effective and more civilized workplaces, but don't do it.

     In any event, I love this little article and thank the Onion folks for their lovely work.

    Here is the full Onion article

    Study: Not Being An Asshole Boss May Boost Employee Morale

    July 30, 2008 | Issue 44•31

    WAUKEGAN, IL—In what is being called a breakthrough discovery in worker-administrator relations, a study released Monday in the Journal Of Occupational Science
    found that not being a total asshole supervisor may be linked to
    improved worker spirit. "In nearly every trial, we found staff morale
    runs considerably higher when bosses don't read workers' e-mail over
    their shoulders, complain about their superior salaries, or act in any
    way like giant, self- centered assholes," said Erica Gorochow, one of
    the study's researchers. "Similarly, we found that typical dick manager
    phrases like 'I don't disagree' can weaken worker disposition by as
    much as 63 percent." Although the study's findings have already sent
    shock waves through the business community, Gorochow warned that some
    of the results may have been compromised, as the bitch lead researcher
    was breathing down her neck the whole time.

    P.S. Thanks to Kevin and Scott for telling me about this story.

  • The Dangers of a White Cover: A Dirty Book in a Beijing Bookstore

    NARChina
    Alex Smyth, one of my favorite former students and course assistants at Stanford, sent me this picture of The No Asshole Rule from a Beijing Bookstore.  He took the picture in May when he was visiting. 

    It appears that a lot of people were getting their hands on it. Alex writes,

    "Thought I'd share
    with you this picture of a very well-thumbed paperback copy of the No Asshole
    Rule I found in the main English-language bookstore in Beijing.  Note the
    sheer amount of dirt and grime…- There were a few other much-cleaner copies,
    but everyone seemed to be using this one to browse through…"

    P.S. The paperback version isn't out yet in the U.S. and won't be out for sometime.  In China, they are selling the trade paperback version that is published in the United Kingdom. Note the spelling of "civilised."

  • Wisdom From BART Executives

    Bart-train2
    I give talk yesterday on The Knowing-Doing Gap to executives at BART, the Bay Area Rapid Transit system.  They run a system that includes over 100 miles of track in the San Francisco area and that carries almost 400,000 riders a day. I was fortunate enough to get a behind-the-scenes tour of some of the operation.  I was impressed with the great job that these people do of keeping this complex system running, and was especially struck by two things. 

    The first thing was their story about how they built their internal, home grown, computer system for tracking trains and communicating with each other throughout the system.  They did it for about 5 million dollars and it is mostly open-source code.  It was a classic case where necessity is the mother of invention, or if you prefer different language, where innovation happened because of a big constraint that they had to work around (See what Diego says about constraint and creativity).  They couldn’t afford a 20 million dollar proprietary system from an outside vendor, so they had to do something different.  The result is that they now have a system that does an impressive job of making information nearly all key aspects of operations easily and quickly available, that fits their needs, and that they can easily modify as they learn along the way.  I was also interested in what they had done because I know that one of the causes of Jet Blue’s infamous fiasco on February 14th, 2007, where thousands of passengers were trapped on planes, was that they were using a system from an external vendor to track planes and so on that they had outgrown. 

     The second thing that I learned was a bit of wisdom from a senior executive who had been at BART for many years.  He was describing his leadership philosophy, which emphasized an urgency to act and to make things right.  But he also emphasized that the kinds of things they do at BART — running and sustaining such a complex interdependent system — can’t happen without intense information sharing and cooperation.  As such, when we were talking about the challenges of managing performance, he commented that there are two kinds of things employees which could make that always provokes his immediate attention: 1. treating others with disrespect and 2. communicating poorly with others.  I think that is great advice for any leader.

    I’ve been riding BART for over 25 years and it does work very well. It was impressive to see it from the inside. Certainly, they face all sorts of political challenges and other problems, but I think they are doing a mighty good job. Most of the trains do run on time!

  • Porcupines With Hearts of Gold Over at BusinessWeek.com

    Porcupine

    As I wrote a few weeks back, BusinessWeek is trying an experiment where they are using blogs and comments on blogs to produce material for a forthcoming double-issue on the workplace.  So I have been blogging a bit in the section on toxic bosses. My editor there, Michele Conlin, tells me that the blogging part of this experiment is winding down and they are now moving toward selecting and editing the content. She especially liked the story about the “Asshole Boxing” methods used by the salesman with an asshole boss. I also put up a new post over there yesterday on “porcupines with hearts of gold,” which argues that it is wise to be slow to label people as assholes, in part, because some people have rough exteriors but are great people once you get past the initial impression. I am very curious to see how the special issue comes out, and in any event, I have to give BusinessWeek credit for having the courage to experiment with something new.

  • The No Asshole Rule for Doctors: Hospitals Will Risk Losing Accreditation

    I’ve written here and in The No Asshole Rule about how physicians are among the worst bullies, and also, about how when people around them (especially nurses) fear that they will be bullied for pointing-out mistakes by doctors, that the lack of psychological safety leads to more mistakes (and also drives good people out of nursing and other medical professions).  I have seen this kind of bullying first hand (see this post about Dr. Gooser) as well. And see this post too about an asshole infested hospital. It appears that with this recent court ruling against a bullying doctor and, more recently, with is new set of guidelines for hospitals for the Joint Commission, which accredits most U.S. hospitals, that the pressure against asshole doctors is mounting. I quote from this AP story:

    ‘CHICAGO – Bullying doctors can make nurses afraid to question their
    performance, resulting in medical errors, according to a hospital group
    that announced new requirements for cracking down on intimidating
    behavior.

    Outbursts and condescending language threaten patient safety and
    increase the cost of care, according to a safety alert issued Wednesday
    by the Joint Commission, an independent organization that accredits
    most of the nation’s hospitals.

    Hospitals will be required by next year to have codes of conduct and
    processes for dealing with inappropriate behavior by staff, said the
    group’s president, Dr. Mark Chassin. Hospitals without such systems
    risk losing their accreditation, he said.

    Powerful doctors mean money for hospitals because they choose where
    to admit their patients, but they “should not be left off the hook,”
    said Dr. Peter Angood, vice president of the group, which is based in
    suburban Chicago.

    Grena Porto, a nurse involved in the group’s efforts, said nurses
    need to be “appropriately assertive” and feel safe enough to ask a
    doctor, “Are you sure we’re supposed to operate on the right leg,
    rather than the left?”

    Nurses, pharmacists and hospital administrators also can be
    culprits, but it’s the doctors who bully nurses that are the most
    significant for patient safety, said Dr. Alan Rosenstein, a researcher
    on the topic. He applauded the group’s action.’

  • BNET Story On How Tough Financial Times Create Crummy Workplaces

    Lindsey Blakely interviewed me a few weeks ago for a BNET article on  “Five Signs That You Have a Crummy Job.”  She identifies five ways that downturns can make life worse even for people in organizations who have survived layoffs. Blakely marches through unpleasant changes such as reduced innovation, severed emotional ties, a climate of fear, and the one I talked about — that the bureaucrats sometimes seize power. The classic effect is that the rest of the organization shrinks, while the number of people who deal with money and enforcing rules increases, leaving fewer people to do the actual work of the organization. And those that remain are subjected to more and more red tape that is instituted in the name of saving money.  So the people doing the real work get less and less efficient, and the rule mongers keep reproducing themselves, and thus write and enforce more rules.

    BUT I think that it is important to point out that tough times don’t always lead to these and other dysfunctions.  Some of the most effective leaders use financial troubles and other crises as an opportunity to make changes that can strengthen the organization. For example, check out this post at Harvard Business Online on Alan Meyer’s classic study that compares the different reactions of hospitals to a crisis.  Those leaders that labeled the crisis as an opportunity– rather than a threat — were able to make some impressive changes in their organizations.  Here is the advice I gave in that post last year based on Meyer’s study and other research, and I think it holds pretty well for leaders in a variety of settings:

     If you want to make the best out of a good situation, focus on what is going wrong and can go wrong.

    If you want to make the best out of a bad situation, focus on what is going right and could go right.

    Thanks, and let me know what you think of the crummy job article, including any other crummy things that happen and — especially — how to stop crummy things from happening to organizations when the going gets tough.