I am pleased, and a bit surprised that my now 10 day old post at Harvard Business Review on 12 Things The Good Bosses Believe is still the most read. It is nice to see that people resonate with these topics from Good Boss, Bad Boss and my other writings, but I think something else is going on. I was talking to one of the editors from HBR last week, one experienced in the ways of the web and blogs, and she commented on something I guess I knew but had never quite thought of before: People love lists — they attract attention on blogs and just about any other place in life.
As I thought back to posts I have written that have generated the strongest responses, many turn out to be lists. Certainly people had a lot to say about my updated list of 17 Things I Believe and some of my most popular posts over the years include Places That Don't Tolerate Assholes and Tips for Surviving Workplace Assholes. More recently, my list of 10 Suspect Assumptions from HR and my short list of the Dumbest Practices Used By U.S. Companies generated dozens of additional suggestions from readers. For example, Wally Bock had some great ones to add to the list of dumb practices:
We
ignore the importance of supervision. We "promote" people into
supervisory jobs without evaluating if they have a good shot at
succeeding. Then we give them little to no training and even less
support. Then we wonder why they don't succeed.
We hope for magical leadership instead of developing good systems.
When we do develop systems we favor the engineered and the technological
over the human and common-sensical.
So, what is it with lists? This is a trick you see everywhere that people want to attract attention, from David Letterman's nightly top 10 list to Bill Maher's New Rules and on and on. Why do we
love to read them, generate them, and add to others?
Leave a Reply